FinanceToolkit

Unverified Other strategy on Indices by JerBouma. BotFinder score 18 out of 100.

Transparent and Efficient Financial Analysis

Source: github

Explorer/Indices/FinanceToolkit
18
Data index
IndicesMedium risk⚠ Unverified

FinanceToolkit

JerBoumaGitHub
From
Free
Get this bot
Net return
—
Max drawdown
—
Sharpe
—
Profit factor
—
Win rate
—
Track record
7.6y
BotFinder Analysis

BotFinder analysis pending.

About

FinanceToolkit

While browsing a variety of websites, I repeatedly observed significant fluctuations in the same financial metric among different sources. Similarly, the reported financial statements often didn't line up, and there was limited information on the methodology used to calculate each metric. For example, Microsoft's Price-to-Earnings (PE) ratio on the 6th of May, 2023 is reported to be 28.93 (Stockopedia), 32.05 (Morningstar), 32.66 (Macrotrends), 33.09 (Finance Charts), 33.66 (Y Charts), 33.67 (Wall Street Journal), 33.80 (Yahoo Finance) and 34.4 (Companies Market Cap). All of these calculations are correct, however the method of calculation varies leading to different results. Therefore, collecting data from multiple sources can lead to wrong interpretation of the results given that one source could apply a different definition than another. And that is, if that definition is even available as often the underlying methods are hidden behind a paid subscription. This is why I designed the FinanceToolkit, this is an open-source toolkit in which all relevant financial methods (500+) are w

PythonMITOpen-sourcealgorithmic-tradingequitiesfactor-analysisfinancefinancial-analysisfinancial-datafinancial-statementsfundamental-analysis
Track record

⚠ No verified equity curve — no track-record source connected.

Risk

Drawdown profile

Data unavailable — contact the owner.

Evidence

Verification ledger

Live-audited
Broker-verified
Capital-backed
Tamper-proof
Historical evolution

How the score has moved

Recalculated at each data collection. Transparency means showing the bad weeks too.

No score history is stored yet — only the current score is shown.

Reviews

Reviews & comments

No reviews collected from the source yet.

Live monitoring

⚠ No live verification account connected — ask for proof before buying.

Alerts on changes: coming soon

Prop-firm compatibility

Prop-firm compatibility not provided.

Source
JerBouma
Since 2023 · 2 bots

Open-source maintainer on GitHub.

Trust 0Profile
Score & reliability18/100
Perf data0/35
Community0/25
Evidence8/20
Recency10/10
Verification0/10

Data-completeness & trust index (not a profitability rating)

Source facts
Stars5,392
Forks626
Open issues6
LanguagePython
LicenseMIT
Last update2026-10-01
Created2019-04-08
Website
Alternatives

Similar bots worth comparing

58
ESCQ NAS100 Sweep M2NEW
Publisher's own bot
—
Return
−10.64%
Max DD
-14.24%
PF
0.43
⚠ Publisher Claimed
IndicesMedium
58
ESCQ NAS100 Flip M2NEW
Publisher's own bot
—
Return
−17.94%
Max DD
-23.29%
PF
0.75
⚠ Publisher Claimed
IndicesMedium
58
ESCQ NAS100 Flip M1NEW
Publisher's own bot
—
Return
−21.67%
Max DD
-27.91%
PF
0.81
⚠ Publisher Claimed
IndicesMedium