RNN-stocks-prediction

Unverified ML strategy on Indices by personal-coding. BotFinder score 18 out of 100.

EUR/USD Binary Options Predictions: Using Deep Learning and Random Forest.

Source: github

Explorer/Indices/RNN-stocks-prediction
18
Data index
IndicesMLMedium risk⚠ Unverified

RNN-stocks-prediction

personal-codingGitHub
From
Free
Get this bot
Net return
—
Max drawdown
—
Sharpe
—
Profit factor
—
Win rate
—
Track record
6.3y
BotFinder Analysis

BotFinder analysis pending.

About

RNN-stocks-prediction

Predicting EUR/USD Binary Options Using Deep Learning and Random Forest: A Comparative Study Introduction: This study aims to predict EUR/USD binary options using deep learning and random forest models, and explore the challenges and strategies for improving the accuracy of these models. The study uses live data from Dukascopy, and builds upon the work of SolbiatiAlessandro, who used a recurrent neural network (RNN) to predict EUR/USD binary options on a Dukascopy demo account. The original code faced issues with scraping live data and executing trades accurately. To overcome these issues, the study proposes a new framework for pulling live data from Dukascopy at the end of each minute, and executing trades within 1-2 seconds of a minute finishing. Methodology: The study uses a comparative approach to test ten instruments, including EUR/USD, EUR/JPY, EUR/GBP, EUR/CAD, EUR/CHF, XAU/USD, XAG/USD, EUR/HKD, USD/CNH, and EUR/SGD. Two models were tested, including a random forest and an LSTM model. The models were trained on minute data from April 1, 2020, to the present, and tested live f

Jupyter NotebookOpen-sourcealgo-tradingalgotradingdeep-learningtradingtrading-bottrading-strategies
Track record

⚠ No verified equity curve — no track-record source connected.

Risk

Drawdown profile

Data unavailable — contact the owner.

Evidence

Verification ledger

Live-audited
Broker-verified
Capital-backed
Tamper-proof
Historical evolution

How the score has moved

Recalculated at each data collection. Transparency means showing the bad weeks too.

No score history is stored yet — only the current score is shown.

Reviews

Reviews & comments

No reviews collected from the source yet.

Live monitoring

⚠ No live verification account connected — ask for proof before buying.

Alerts on changes: coming soon

Prop-firm compatibility

Prop-firm compatibility not provided.

Source
personal-coding
Since 2022 · 3 bots

Open-source maintainer on GitHub.

Trust 0Profile
Score & reliability18/100
Perf data0/35
Community0/25
Evidence8/20
Recency10/10
Verification0/10

Data-completeness & trust index (not a profitability rating)

Source facts
Stars19
Forks6
Open issues0
LanguageJupyter Notebook
License—
Last update2023-04-06
Created2020-07-06
Alternatives

Similar bots worth comparing

58
ESCQ NAS100 Sweep M2NEW
Publisher's own bot
—
Return
−10.64%
Max DD
-14.24%
PF
0.43
⚠ Publisher Claimed
IndicesMedium
58
ESCQ NAS100 Flip M2NEW
Publisher's own bot
—
Return
−17.94%
Max DD
-23.29%
PF
0.75
⚠ Publisher Claimed
IndicesMedium
58
ESCQ NAS100 Flip M1NEW
Publisher's own bot
—
Return
−21.67%
Max DD
-27.91%
PF
0.81
⚠ Publisher Claimed
IndicesMedium