HighFrequencyEconometrics-HAR-vs.-Neural-Networks

Unverified ML strategy on Indices by RasLillebo. BotFinder score 18 out of 100.

Inspired by Hillebrand & Medeiros (2009) and Corsi (2009), I put neural networks in a High frequency environment, and tested the performance of the two models (HAR & Neural Network

Source: github

Explorer/Indices/HighFrequencyEconometrics-HAR-vs.-Neural-Networks
18
Data index
IndicesMLMedium risk⚠ Unverified

HighFrequencyEconometrics-HAR-vs.-Neural-Networks

RasLilleboGitHub
From
Free
Get this bot
Net return
—
Max drawdown
—
Sharpe
—
Profit factor
—
Win rate
—
Track record
6.2y
BotFinder Analysis

BotFinder analysis pending.

About

HighFrequencyEconometrics-HAR-vs.-Neural-Networks

High Frequency Econometrics: HAR vs. Neural-Networks (Disclaimer: High Frequency Econometrics, High Frequency data manipulation, HAR, Neural Networks, Bagging, Cross-validation, Bayesian Ensemble) Inspired by Hillebrand & Medeiros (2009) and Corsi (2009), I put neural networks in a High frequency environment, and tested the performance of the two models (HAR & Neural Networks). - The data used in this project is 2 years worth of intraday 5-minute realized volatility (See: Sheppard, Patton, Liu, 2012) from S&P500 stocks, that has been scrutinized using bivariate analysis and manipulation into a single dimension. Introduction to the models: HAR (Heterogenous Autoregressive model): Developed by Corsi in 2009, this model is based on a simple regression framework. The independent variables are simply the daily volatility lagged 1, 5 and 22 days respectively. This is to simulate the volatility of yesterday, a week ago, and approximately one month ago (Only taking open market days into account). This type of model is also called a 'Long memory'-model, as it "remembers" what happened

ROpen-sourceheterogeneityheterogeneous-networkhigh-frequency-tradingneural-network
Track record

⚠ No verified equity curve — no track-record source connected.

Risk

Drawdown profile

Data unavailable — contact the owner.

Evidence

Verification ledger

Live-audited
Broker-verified
Capital-backed
Tamper-proof
Historical evolution

How the score has moved

Recalculated at each data collection. Transparency means showing the bad weeks too.

No score history is stored yet — only the current score is shown.

Reviews

Reviews & comments

No reviews collected from the source yet.

Live monitoring

⚠ No live verification account connected — ask for proof before buying.

Alerts on changes: coming soon

Prop-firm compatibility

Prop-firm compatibility not provided.

Source
RasLillebo
Since 2022 · 1 bots

Open-source maintainer on GitHub.

Trust 0Profile
Score & reliability18/100
Perf data0/35
Community0/25
Evidence8/20
Recency10/10
Verification0/10

Data-completeness & trust index (not a profitability rating)

Source facts
Stars18
Forks1
Open issues0
LanguageR
License—
Last update2020-09-11
Created2020-08-09
Alternatives

Similar bots worth comparing

58
ESCQ NAS100 Sweep M2NEW
Publisher's own bot
—
Return
−10.64%
Max DD
-14.24%
PF
0.43
⚠ Publisher Claimed
IndicesMedium
58
ESCQ NAS100 Flip M2NEW
Publisher's own bot
—
Return
−17.94%
Max DD
-23.29%
PF
0.75
⚠ Publisher Claimed
IndicesMedium
58
ESCQ NAS100 Flip M1NEW
Publisher's own bot
—
Return
−21.67%
Max DD
-27.91%
PF
0.81
⚠ Publisher Claimed
IndicesMedium
HighFrequencyEconometrics-HAR-vs.-Neural-Networks by RasLillebo — Unverified | BotFinder