Backtesting-Trading-Strategies-with-Python

Unverified Mean-rev strategy on Indices by SharmaVidhiHaresh. BotFinder score 18 out of 100.

In this project, I had backtested the cross-over trading strategy on Google Stock from Jan 2016 to June 2020. By using historical time-series data, I had tested the Moving Average(

Source: github

Explorer/Indices/Backtesting-Trading-Strategies-with-Python
18
Data index
IndicesMean-revMedium risk⚠ Unverified

Backtesting-Trading-Strategies-with-Python

SharmaVidhiHareshGitHub
From
Free
Get this bot
Net return
—
Max drawdown
—
Sharpe
—
Profit factor
—
Win rate
—
Track record
6.2y
BotFinder Analysis

BotFinder analysis pending.

About

Backtesting-Trading-Strategies-with-Python

Backtesting-Trading-Strategies-with Python We would backtest the cross-over trading strategy on Google Stock from Jan 2016 to June 2020. By using historical data, we can test the returns and risk of the employing Moving Average(MA) cross-over strategy and Relative Strength Index (RSI) strategy under various market conditions. Premises of the strategy Relative Strength Index (RSI) The relative strength index (RSI) is a momentum indicator used in technical analysis that measures the magnitude of recent price changes to evaluate overbought or oversold conditions in the price of a stock or other asset. Traditional interpretation and usage of the RSI are that values of 70 or above indicate that a security is becoming overbought or overvalued and may be primed for a trend reversal or corrective pullback in price. An RSI reading of 30 or below indicates an oversold or undervalued condition. Moving Average (MA) Crossover The shorter the time span used to create the average, the more sensitive it will be to price changes. The longer the time span, the less sensitive the average will be. upwar

Jupyter NotebookOpen-sourcebacktesting-trading-strategiesfinancepythonpythonforfinancetrading-algorithmstrading-strategies
Track record

⚠ No verified equity curve — no track-record source connected.

Risk

Drawdown profile

Data unavailable — contact the owner.

Evidence

Verification ledger

Live-audited
Broker-verified
Capital-backed
Tamper-proof
Historical evolution

How the score has moved

Recalculated at each data collection. Transparency means showing the bad weeks too.

No score history is stored yet — only the current score is shown.

Reviews

Reviews & comments

No reviews collected from the source yet.

Live monitoring

⚠ No live verification account connected — ask for proof before buying.

Alerts on changes: coming soon

Prop-firm compatibility

Prop-firm compatibility not provided.

Source
SharmaVidhiHaresh
Since 2018 · 1 bots

Open-source maintainer on GitHub.

Trust 0Profile
Score & reliability18/100
Perf data0/35
Community0/25
Evidence8/20
Recency10/10
Verification0/10

Data-completeness & trust index (not a profitability rating)

Source facts
Stars44
Forks13
Open issues1
LanguageJupyter Notebook
License—
Last update2020-08-10
Created2020-08-10
Alternatives

Similar bots worth comparing

58
ESCQ NAS100 Sweep M2NEW
Publisher's own bot
—
Return
−10.64%
Max DD
-14.24%
PF
0.43
⚠ Publisher Claimed
IndicesMedium
58
ESCQ NAS100 Flip M2NEW
Publisher's own bot
—
Return
−17.94%
Max DD
-23.29%
PF
0.75
⚠ Publisher Claimed
IndicesMedium
58
ESCQ NAS100 Flip M1NEW
Publisher's own bot
—
Return
−21.67%
Max DD
-27.91%
PF
0.81
⚠ Publisher Claimed
IndicesMedium