Index-Rebalancing

Unverified ML strategy on Indices by lukegeel101. BotFinder score 18 out of 100.

Machine-learning research on S&P index rebalancing, stock-price effects, linear regression, and LSTM forecasting.

Source: github

Explorer/Indices/Index-Rebalancing
18
Data index
IndicesMLMedium risk⚠ Unverified

Index-Rebalancing

lukegeel101GitHub
From
Free
Get this bot
Net return
—
Max drawdown
—
Sharpe
—
Profit factor
—
Win rate
—
Track record
3.5y
BotFinder Analysis

BotFinder analysis pending.

About

Index-Rebalancing

Index-Rebalancing Can machine learning identify which stocks will move after they are added to an S&P index? This UMass Amherst research project combines market data, linear regression, and LSTM models to study the 24-hour price effect around index-rebalancing announcements. At a glance | Question | Approach | Main limitation | | --- | --- | --- | | Forecast the price change after an index addition. | Compare interpretable linear regression with an LSTM using company, sector, index, volume, dividend, and market-cap features. | The committed dataset contains only 92 usable observations because of historical API coverage and missing data. | [!NOTE] This is an exploratory research project, not investment advice or evidence of a production-ready trading strategy. Reproduce the committed evaluation The supported evaluation path fingerprints the committed CSV and recomputes its coverage and descriptive metrics without retraining the historical notebooks. | Verified dataset metric | Result | | --- | ---: | | Observations | 92 | | Unique tickers | 91 | | S&P indices | 3 | | GICS sectors | 11

Jupyter NotebookMITOpen-sourcealgorithmic-tradingindex-rebalancingjupyter-notebooklinear-regressionlstmlstm-neural-networksmachine-learningpython
Track record

⚠ No verified equity curve — no track-record source connected.

Risk

Drawdown profile

Data unavailable — contact the owner.

Evidence

Verification ledger

Live-audited
Broker-verified
Capital-backed
Tamper-proof
Historical evolution

How the score has moved

Recalculated at each data collection. Transparency means showing the bad weeks too.

No score history is stored yet — only the current score is shown.

Reviews

Reviews & comments

No reviews collected from the source yet.

Live monitoring

⚠ No live verification account connected — ask for proof before buying.

Alerts on changes: coming soon

Prop-firm compatibility

Prop-firm compatibility not provided.

Source
lukegeel101
Since 2016 · 1 bots

Open-source maintainer on GitHub.

Trust 0Profile
Score & reliability18/100
Perf data0/35
Community0/25
Evidence8/20
Recency10/10
Verification0/10

Data-completeness & trust index (not a profitability rating)

Source facts
Stars11
Forks2
Open issues0
LanguageJupyter Notebook
LicenseMIT
Last update2026-08-31
Created2023-04-16
Alternatives

Similar bots worth comparing

58
ESCQ NAS100 Sweep M2NEW
Publisher's own bot
—
Return
−10.64%
Max DD
-14.24%
PF
0.43
⚠ Publisher Claimed
IndicesMedium
58
ESCQ NAS100 Flip M2NEW
Publisher's own bot
—
Return
−17.94%
Max DD
-23.29%
PF
0.75
⚠ Publisher Claimed
IndicesMedium
58
ESCQ NAS100 Flip M1NEW
Publisher's own bot
—
Return
−21.67%
Max DD
-27.91%
PF
0.81
⚠ Publisher Claimed
IndicesMedium