notebooks

Unverified Trend strategy on Indices by rolling-panda-san. BotFinder score 18 out of 100.

Analysis on systematic trading strategies (e.g., trend-following, carry and mean-reversion). The result is regularly updated.

Source: github

Explorer/Indices/notebooks
18
Data index
IndicesTrendMedium risk⚠ Unverified

notebooks

rolling-panda-sanGitHub
From
Free
Get this bot
Net return
—
Max drawdown
—
Sharpe
—
Profit factor
—
Win rate
—
Track record
10.0y
BotFinder Analysis

BotFinder analysis pending.

About

notebooks

Analysis on systematic trading strategies What is this repo? This repository documents researches on - Systematic trading strategies (mainly using futures at the moment) that are published in the academic space - Some other miscellaneous results The purpose is to reproduce what are presented in the papers, update the results on a regular basis and potentially add further experiments. Notebooks are automatically pushed to github. Throughout the notebooks, an internal library called vivace is used to facilitate the data management and quantitative analysis. This library will remain private as it's proprietary. What are the contents? Currently, it maintains the following trading strategies | Strategy name | Main reference | Asset class | Notebook | |---------------------------------------------|------------------------------|-------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------| | Time-series momentum | Moskowitz 2012 | Equity, Fixed-income, FX, Commodity | trendfollowingmoskowitz2012.ipynb | | Time-series momentum | Baltas 2020 | Equity, Fixed-income

Jupyter NotebookMITOpen-sourcealgorithmic-tradingbacktestcommoditiescurrenciesequitiesfixed-incomeinvestment-strategiesjupyter-notebook
Track record

⚠ No verified equity curve — no track-record source connected.

Risk

Drawdown profile

Data unavailable — contact the owner.

Evidence

Verification ledger

Live-audited
Broker-verified
Capital-backed
Tamper-proof
Historical evolution

How the score has moved

Recalculated at each data collection. Transparency means showing the bad weeks too.

No score history is stored yet — only the current score is shown.

Reviews

Reviews & comments

No reviews collected from the source yet.

Live monitoring

⚠ No live verification account connected — ask for proof before buying.

Alerts on changes: coming soon

Prop-firm compatibility

Prop-firm compatibility not provided.

Source
rolling-panda-san
Since 2021 · 1 bots

Open-source maintainer on GitHub.

Trust 0Profile
Score & reliability18/100
Perf data0/35
Community0/25
Evidence8/20
Recency10/10
Verification0/10

Data-completeness & trust index (not a profitability rating)

Source facts
Stars764
Forks115
Open issues4
LanguageJupyter Notebook
LicenseMIT
Last update2026-10-02
Created2016-11-12
Alternatives

Similar bots worth comparing

58
ESCQ NAS100 Sweep M2NEW
Publisher's own bot
—
Return
−10.64%
Max DD
-14.24%
PF
0.43
⚠ Publisher Claimed
IndicesMedium
58
ESCQ NAS100 Flip M2NEW
Publisher's own bot
—
Return
−17.94%
Max DD
-23.29%
PF
0.75
⚠ Publisher Claimed
IndicesMedium
58
ESCQ NAS100 Flip M1NEW
Publisher's own bot
—
Return
−21.67%
Max DD
-27.91%
PF
0.81
⚠ Publisher Claimed
IndicesMedium