Label-Unbalance-in-High-Frequency-Trading

Unverified ML strategy on Indices by RS2002. BotFinder score 18 out of 100.

[Likelihood Lab Project 2024] Official Repository for The Technical Report, Label Unbalance in High-frequency Trading

Source: github

Explorer/Indices/Label-Unbalance-in-High-Frequency-Trading
18
Data index
IndicesMLMedium risk⚠ Unverified

Label-Unbalance-in-High-Frequency-Trading

RS2002GitHub
From
Free
Get this bot
Net return
—
Max drawdown
—
Sharpe
—
Profit factor
—
Win rate
—
Track record
2.5y
BotFinder Analysis

BotFinder analysis pending.

About

Label-Unbalance-in-High-Frequency-Trading

Label Unbalance in High Frequency Trading Report: Label Unbalance in High-frequency Trading 高频交易中的标签不平衡问题研究 -- QuantML Method In this project, we mainly focus on the high frequency trading prediction in the scenario of label imbalance, based on machine learning methods. We provide four networks including: MLP, LSTM, BERT, and Mamba as the backbone. We use two simple methods to reduce the influence of label imbalance, including: resampling and class weighting. Dataset Due to copyright restrictions, we do not provide the original data. However, we provide the data structure and class distribution in our experiment. As a result, you can replace the dataset.py file with your own data and change some necessary parameters in trainclassification.py to run the code on your dataset. How to Run To run the model, you can use the following command: To change the model scale or other parameters related to training, please refer to the getargs function. We provide the following methods for addressing label imbalance: - --classweight: You can specify the weight for each class in the loss function.

PythonOpen-sourcehigh-frequency-tradinglongtailstock-price-predictionunbalanced-data
Track record

⚠ No verified equity curve — no track-record source connected.

Risk

Drawdown profile

Data unavailable — contact the owner.

Evidence

Verification ledger

Live-audited
Broker-verified
Capital-backed
Tamper-proof
Historical evolution

How the score has moved

Recalculated at each data collection. Transparency means showing the bad weeks too.

No score history is stored yet — only the current score is shown.

Reviews

Reviews & comments

No reviews collected from the source yet.

Live monitoring

⚠ No live verification account connected — ask for proof before buying.

Alerts on changes: coming soon

Prop-firm compatibility

Prop-firm compatibility not provided.

Source
RS2002
Since 2018 · 1 bots

Open-source maintainer on GitHub.

Trust 0Profile
Score & reliability18/100
Perf data0/35
Community0/25
Evidence8/20
Recency10/10
Verification0/10

Data-completeness & trust index (not a profitability rating)

Source facts
Stars29
Forks10
Open issues1
LanguagePython
License—
Last update2025-03-20
Created2024-03-30
Website
Alternatives

Similar bots worth comparing

58
ESCQ NAS100 Sweep M2NEW
Publisher's own bot
—
Return
−10.64%
Max DD
-14.24%
PF
0.43
⚠ Publisher Claimed
IndicesMedium
58
ESCQ NAS100 Flip M2NEW
Publisher's own bot
—
Return
−17.94%
Max DD
-23.29%
PF
0.75
⚠ Publisher Claimed
IndicesMedium
58
ESCQ NAS100 Flip M1NEW
Publisher's own bot
—
Return
−21.67%
Max DD
-27.91%
PF
0.81
⚠ Publisher Claimed
IndicesMedium